Diagnostic Imaging Pathways Logo

  • Pathways
  • Normal Anatomy
  • Medical Images
  • Radiation Module
  • Radiation Quiz
  • Menu
  • Search

Osteoporosis (suspected)

Population Covered By The Guidance

This pathway provides guidance on the imaging of adult patients with suspected osteoporosis.

Lead Researcher: Manusha Ratnayake

Experts & Contributors: Jonathon Beilin, Richard Mendelson, Karen Rothacker

Editorial Panel: Core membership
Link to Editorial Panel

Date reviewed: December 2014

Date Published: March 2015

Image 1a (DEXA scan): The left hip bone mineral density measures 0.785 gm/cm^2. This correlates with a 'T' score of -2.2, and a 'Z' score of -1.6.

Osteoporosis

Image 1b (DEXA scan): The lumbar spine bone mineral density measures 0.781 gm/cm^2. This correlates with a 'T' score of -2.8 and a 'Z' score of -2.5.

Based on the WHO Diagnostic Categories for Osteoporosis, the lowest T score of -2.8 in the lumbar spine indicates osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis

Image 2 (Lumbar spine radiograph): Multiple vertebral crush fractures on a background of severe osteoporosis.

Complications of osteoporosis

Image 3 (Pelvis radiograph): AP view of a comminuted inter-trochanteric fracture of the left hip.

Complications of osteoporosis

Image 4 (Pelvis radiograph): AP view of an impacted sub-capital right hip fracture.

Complications of osteoporosis

Image 5 (Wrist radiograph): Impacted fracture of the distal left radius.

Complications of osteoporosis

  • Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in the risk of fracture
  • It is an important public health issue that is often under-recognised in the community until a disabling fracture occurs
  • There are several indications for testing of bone mineral density, as a surrogate marker of osteoporosis
  • DEXA is currently the favoured modality for determining bone mineral density
  • The World Health Organisation has developed strict criteria that determines eligibility for osteoporotic treatment
  • Several pharmacological treatments are available that effectively treat osteoporosis and prevent further loss of bone density
  • In patients with established osteoporosis, the institution of an appropriate anti-osteoporotic pharmaceutical regime reduces subsequent fracture risk by 50 percent and also reduces premature mortality 19

Date of literature search: November 2014

The search methodology is available on request. Email

References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document

  1. Osteoporosis Australia. Bone density testing in general practice. [www.osteoporosis.org.au]. [cited 2014 December 2]. View the reference
  2. Hazes JM, Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade 2000-2010. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):1-3. (Editorial). View the reference
  3. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996;312(7041):1254-9. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  4. O'Neill S, MacLennan A, Bass S, et al. Guidelines for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis for GPs. Aust Fam Physician. 2004;33(11):910-9. (Review article). View the reference
  5. Writing guidelines for the ISCD position development conference. Indications and reporting for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7(1):37-44. (Guideline). View the reference
  6. Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:368-81. (Review article). View the reference
  7. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post menopausal osteoporosis: a report of WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129. (WHO technical series 843). View the reference
  8. Australian Government: Department of Health and Ageing. Medicare Benefits Schedule Online. [www.mbsonline.gov.au]. [updated 2013 November 5; cited 2014 December 2]. View the reference
  9. Genant HK. Current State of bone densitometry for osteoporosis. Radiographics. 1998;18(4):913-8. (Review article). View the reference
  10. Osteoporosis Australia. Prevent the next fracture - a guide for GPs. 2nd Edn. 2008.
  11. Center J, Bliuc D, Nguyen T, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2007;297(4):387-94. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  12. Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen, et al. Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(3):190-5. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  13. Khaw K, Reeve J, Luben R, et al. Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet. 2004;363(9404):197-202. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  14. Nayak S, Olkin I, Liu H, et al. Meta-analysis: accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(11):832-41. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  15. Marlin F, Lopez-Bastida J, Diez-Perez A, et al. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effective analysis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;74(3):277-83. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  16. McCauley E, Mackie A, Elliot D, et al. Heel bone densitometry: device specific thresholds for the assessment of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol. 2006;79(942):464-7. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  17. Boehm H, Link T. Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2004;2(2):41-6. (Review article). View the reference
  18. Bliuc D, Alarkawi D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014. (in publication) (Level I evidence). View the reference
  19. Selecki Y, Eisman JA. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: a practical approach. MedicineToday. 2014;15(11):18-27. (Review article). View the reference
  20. Nanes MS, Kallen CB. Osteoporosis.. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(6):439-50. (Review article). View the reference
  21. Blake GM, Fogelman I. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(982):509-17. (Review article). View the reference

Pathway User Guide

Yellow Boxes Denotes extra information. Some contain single or multiple white sub-boxes, click a white box to reveal detailed information in a pop-up.

White Boxes: Denotes standard pathway steps. (If inside a yellow box, they open a specific pop-up).

Zoom & Pan Controls: Use + / − or the slider to zoom. Reset returns to default. Tick Panning to drag the diagram when zoomed.

Blue “View Full Screen” Button: Opens the whole diagram in a large, full-screen pop-up window. Use Close to exit.

The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.

SYMBOL RRL EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE
No radiation None 0
Minimal radiation Minimal < 1 millisieverts
Low radiation Low 1-5 mSv
Medium radiation Medium 5-10 mSv
High radiation High >10 mSv

Disclaimer

Status Of Recommendations Each pathway is designed to assist clinicians in situations when faced with a large array of possible diagnostic tests and examinations. However, it is recognised that diagnostic practice may differ from a particular pathway depending on local availability of equipment and expertise, as well as the experience of individual clinicians. Therefore each pathway is neither a rigid set of rules, nor a substitute for clinical assessment, and individual patient circumstances should always be considered.

Report an Issue

Spotted an error or outdated info? Click to tell us.

Date reviewed: December 2014Please note that this pathway issubject to review and revisionIs there an immediatehistory of a minimaltrauma fracture?DEXADEXADEXACan the patient beclassified asosteoporotic orosteopaenic?Can the patient beclassified asosteoporotic orosteopaenic?If clinically relevant,have other causes forfracture been ruled out?Other imagingmodalities used insuspectedosteoporosisWhat do I need to know?YesYesYesIf no secondarycause foundInvestigate asdeemed clinicallyappropriateIf cause is foundtreat asappropriateBiochemicalinvestigationsBiochemicalinvestigationsBiochemicalinvestigationsRisk factor(s)presentRisk factor(s) notpresentManage as disorder ofdecreased bone mineraldensity (e.g. Osteoporosis,Osteopaenia)NoNoNoYesNo>70 years oldBetween 50 and70 years oldTo decide whether a patient in this agegroup should receive a DEXA scanassess whether any of the following riskfactors are presentWhat is the age ofthe patient?1. Is there evidence of recent minimal trauma fracture?2. Is there biochemical evidence of osteopaenia or osteoporosis?3. Are there indications for a DEXA scan?• Family history-parent or sibling• Early menopause• Hypogonadism• ≥ 3 months glucocorticoids (at Prednisone ≥ 7.5mg) ≥ Coeliac disease/malabsorption disorders• Rheumatoid arthritis• Primary hyperparathyroidism• Hyperthyroidism• Chronic kidney or liver disease• Androgen deprivation therapy• Recurrent falls• Breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors• Treatment with antiepileptic medications• Low body weight• HIV and its treatment• Major depression / SSRI treatment• Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus• Multiple myeloma / monoclonal gammopathy• Organ or bone marrow transplantSUSPECTED OSTEOPOROSISClick on colouredtext to assess forfracture risk usingGARVANFRAXcalculatorcalculatorORClick on colouredtext to assess forfracture risk usingGARVANFRAXcalculatorcalculatorORandFollow upTreatmentClick on colouredtext to assess forfracture risk usingGARVANFRAXcalculatorcalculatorORandFollow upTreatmentandFollow upTreatmentandFollow upConservativemanagementandFollow upConservativemanagementandFollow upConservativemanagement

Osteoporosis (Suspected)

Suspected osteoporosis

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on an assessment of bone mineral density

  • Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in the risk of fracture
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) has designated the first decade of the 21st century, as the 'Decade of Bone and Joint Diseases' recognising the importance of osteoporosis as a public health issue
  • The cost to Australian economy of osteoporosis is estimated to be $7.4 billion dollars per year
  • Osteoporosis is often described as a 'silent disease', with the radiological prevalence of the disease far in excess of diagnosis and active treatment to prevent further bone loss and future fracture
  • Risk factors associated with osteoporosis
    • Family history - parent or sibling
    • Early menopause
    • Hypogonadism
    • ≥3 months glucocorticoids (at prednisolone ≥7.5mg)
    • Coeliac disease / malabsorption disorders
    • Rheumatoid arthritis
    • Primary hyperparathyroidism
    • Hyperthyroidism
    • Chronic kidney or liver disease
    • Androgen deprivation therapy
    • Recurrent falls
    • Breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors
    • Treatment with antiepileptic medications
    • Low body weight
    • HIV and its treatment
    • Major depression / SSRI treatment
    • Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
    • Multiple myeloma / monoclonal gammopathy
    • Organ or bone marrow transplant
  • There are various fracture risk calculators in existence. In Australia a locally developed calculator based on the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study can be found by following this link. Another commonly used tool is the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) which has been developed by WHO. The calculator for this can be found by following this link. The Garvan tool has been shown to be more accurate than the FRAX tool
  • At any age, women are considered to have approximately double the risk of a fracture compared with men. However once a man sustains a fragility fracture his risk of a subsequent fracture is higher than that of an equivalent woman
  • For T scores of -1.0, -2.0 and -3.0 the relative risk of fracture increases by a factor of 1.7, 3.4 and 6.8 respectively

Further Radiological Investigations in the Assessment of Bone Mineral Density

Peripheral DEXA - The use of these devices is increasing due to their ease of use and portability. However individual manufacturers have established their own guidelines that have not been validated in the assessment of bone mineral density in large randomised trials


Spinal Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) - QCT is the most accurate tool to measure bone density, being 2-3 times more sensitive than DEXA in detecting loss of bone mineral. It is the only technique allowing volumetric measurement of the trabecular interior of bone. A major clinical limitation is the radiation exposure when compared to DEXA, as well as cost and resources availability issues

Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) - Several large prospective cohort studies have clearly demonstrated that this modality can predict future fracture risk. , There are several potential advantages over DEXA including expense, portability and lack of ionizing radiation. However a recent large meta-analysis found the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal ultrasound low when compared to DEXA as the standard reference. Furthermore cost-effective analysis utilising QUS as a pre-screening tool prior to DEXA in postmenopausal women has failed to show a benefit

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan

Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan

 

  • The current "gold standard" for the diagnosis of osteoporosis ,
  • DEXA is superior to other techniques for assessing BMD because of its ,
    • Low precision error
    • Low radiation dose and short scan time (approximately one-tenth of that of a standard chest radiograph)
    • Capacity to measure multiple skeletal sites
  • Limitations of DEXA include
    • Hip replacement precludes measurement of hip BMD
    • In the spine, degenerative disease cause falsely elevated results owing to features such as osteophytes and compression fractures
    • Measurements of different DEXA machines may vary considerably for the same individual (it is important to have follow-up scans on the same machine if possible)
  • Results are expressed as Z or T scores, defined as the number of standard deviations (SDs) from the age and sex matched control means (Z score) and from the mean value in a 30 year old (T score)
  • The T score can be expressed as the following:
    (measured BMD minus young adult BMD) / (young adult standard deviation)
  • When interpreting serial DEXA scans it is best to consider the bone density change over time (g/cm2) rather than T scores as T score calculations are age dependent
  • Based on bone densitometry, measured by DEXA and the T score, the World Health Organization classifies the patients into three categories ,
    • Normal bone density: T score greater than -1
    • Osteopenia (low bone mass): T score between -1 and -2.5
    • Osteoporosis: T score less than -2.5
  • For information for consumers about DEXA InsideRadiology

Biochemical Investigations

Biochemical investigations

Biochemical investigations should be obtained to assess for secondary causes of loss in bone density (e.g. osteomalacia). If the patient is hospitalised as a result of the fracture then these investigations can be conducted as an inpatient. Depending on the clinical context the following tests can be requested:

  1. Full blood count
  2. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  3. Calcium
  4. Creatinine
  5. Liver function tests including total alkaline phosphatase and albumin
  6. Thyroid stimulating hormone
  7. Protein electrophoresis
  8. Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody or anti-endomysial antibody
  9. Parathyroid hormone
  10. 25-Hydroxy vitamin D 

Secondary causes of loss in bone density can include:

  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Hyperparathyroidism
  • Renal failure
  • Hyper / hypocalciuria
  • Coeliac disease
  • Haematologic disorders
  • Exogenous medications (e.g. phenytoin, glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, methotrexate, lithium, proton pump inhibitors)
  • Androgen deprivation therapy

  • Patients with a Z score less than 1.5 with risk factors should be evaluated for secondary causes of osteoporosis. The following biochemical investigations can be obtained depending on the clinical context ,
    • Full blood count
    • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
    • Calcium
    • Creatinine
    • Total alkaline phosphatase and albumin
    • Thyroid stimulating hormone
    • Protein electrophoresis
    • Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody or anti-endomysial antibody
    • Parathyroid hormone
    • 25-hydroxy vitamin D
  • Secondary causes of osteoporosis can include
    • Hyperthyroidism
    • Hyperparathyroidism
    • Renal failure
    • Hyper / hypocalcicuria
    • Coeliac disease
    • Hyperthyroidism
    • Haematologic disorders
    • Exogenous medications (e.g. phenytoin, glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, methotrexate, lithium, proton pump inhibitors)
    • Androgen deprivation therapy

Osteoporosis Treatment

Treatment of osteoporosis

Several options exist for the treatment of proven osteoporosis

The general principles of treatment in osteoporosis centre around the following

  • Address and correct any underlying conditions that may be contributing to the development and progression of osteoporosis (e.g. hypogonadism, myeloma, hyperparathyroidism, Cushing’s syndrome, etc)
  • Despite limited evidence there should be a consideration of lifestyle aspects (e.g. encouraging weight-bearing exercise, dietary intake of calcium, cease smoking, evaluate and rectify possible causes of falls, etc)
  • Osteoporosis specific pharmacotherapy
  • Vitamin D and calcium supplementation if inadequate
  • Falls prevention strategies

Osteoporosis Follow Up

Follow up

Follow up of patients with osteoporosis will vary and depend on a variety of factors like BMD level (and the need for subsequent repeat DEXA scans), medication regime, absolute fracture risk and patient factors

The following table contains recommended management and follow up depending on the BMD T score, risk factors and presence or absence of a minimal trauma fracture

T Score
Minimal Trauma Fracture
Risk Factors
Management / Recommendation

≤ -2.5

Present

One or more
  • Initiate treatment with osteoporosis medication immediately.
  • Institute lifestyle / dietary advice.
  • Repeat DEXA in ≥ 2 years.

≤ -2.5

Absent

One or more
  • Treatment recommended though can be tailored to patient depending on absolute fracture risk.
  • Institute dietary / lifestyle advice.
  • Repeat DEXA in ≥ 2 years.

-1.0 to -2.5

Present

One or more
  • In most causes treatment should be instituted.
  • Where the patient is younger (<55) or mildly osteopaenic (-1.0 to -1.5) treatment may be reconsidered.
  • Institute dietary / lifestyle advice.
  • Repeat DEXA in ≥ 2 years.

-1.0 to -2.5

Absent

One or more
  • Treatment not necessary in most cases.
  • Consider treatment for post-menopausal women and men over 65 if T score is in lower part of the osteopaenic range (-2.0 to -2.5).
  • Institute dietary / lifestyle advice.
  • Repeat DEXA in 2-5 years, depending on severity of bone loss.

≥-1.0

Absent

Present
  • Advise on dietary / lifestyle advice and follow-up.

≤-1.5

Absent

Commencing glucocorticoids 7.5mg/day prednisolone or equivalent for at least 3 months.
  • Preventative treatment with osteoporosis medication for the duration of glucocorticoid therapy.

Conservative Management

Conservative management

Points to be addressed in those patients who do not have an indication for DEXA scan (absent risk factors) or whose scan result does not qualify them for osteoporotic treatment

  • The following points should be addressed in those patients who do not have an indication for DEXA scan or whose scan result does not qualify them for osteoporotic treatment
    • General lifestyle advice
    • Advise to stop smoking and consume minimal alcohol
    • Evaluate and rectify possible causes of falls
    • Advocate a regular weight bearing or strengthening exercise program
    • Exposure to indirect sunlight for 15 minutes, four to six times a week
  • Ongoing monitoring for osteopenia/osteoporosis. Regularly monitor height as a loss of height of 2.5cm is a surrogate marker for osteoporosis. Plain radiographs of the spine should be considered for an asymptomatic vertebral fracture

Indications for DEXA

Indications for DEXA

The risk factors highlighted in blue currently attract a medicare rebate in Australia

  • The main high risk groups for whom BMD measurement should be considered include
    1. Patients over 70 years of age
    2. Suspected vertebral fracture where fracture is confirmed then referral for DEXA should be made
    3. Patients with minimal trauma fracture
    4. Patients over 50 with the following risk factors
      • Family history - parent or sibling
      • Early menopause
      • Hypogonadism
      • ≥3 months glucocorticoids (at prednisone ≥7.5mg)
      • Coeliac disease / malabsorption disorders
      • Rheumatoid arthritis
      • Primary hyperparathyroidism
      • Hyperthyroidism
      • Chronic kidney or liver disease
      • Androgen deprivation therapy
      • Recurrent falls
      • Breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors
      • Treatment with antiepileptic medications
      • Low body weight
      • HIV and its treatment
      • Major depression / SSRI treatment
      • Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
      • Multiple myeloma / monoclonal gammopathy
      • Organ or bone marrow transplant
  • Items above highlighted in blue currently have medicare rebates associated with them
  • Guidelines or evidence based reviews on the indications for BMD testing have been published by many organisations. Those of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry for bone density testing are the most comprehensive and clinically useful
    1. Women Aged 65 years and older
    2. Postmenopausal women under age 65 with risk factors for osteoporosis
    3. Men aged 70 years and older
    4. Adults with fragility fracture
    5. Adults with disease or condition associated with low bone mass or bone loss
    6. Adults taking medication associated with low bone mass or bone loss
    7. Anyone being considered for pharmacological osteoporosis therapy
    8. Anyone being treated for low bone mass to monitor treatment effect
    9. Anyone not receiving therapy in whom evidence of bone loss would lead to treatment
    10. Women discontinuing estrogen therapy

Minimal trauma fracture

Minimal trauma fracture

Definitions can vary but generally minimal trauma fractures occur after relatively minor trauma. A common way to ascertain on history taking whether the fracture sustained is a minimal trauma fracture is to ask the patient if they would have expected a similar fracture to occur when they were in their 20’s. If the answer is unsure or no then it is recommended to presume a minimal trauma fracture 

The three most common fracture locations associated with a minimal trauma fracture are vertebral fractures, fractures of the femoral neck and fractures of the distal radius (Colles fractures). Osteoporotic spinal compression fractures are diagnosed when there is loss of height in the anterior, middle, or posterior dimension of the vertebral body that exceeds 20 percent. Based on the vertebral height loss osteoporotic spine fractures can be classified as the following

  • mild: 20-25 percent
  • moderate: 25-40 percent
  • Severe: >40 percent

Other causes for fracture

Other causes for fracture

Other pathological causes for fracture that should be considered if the relevant clinical history is present include conditions like Paget’s disease, benign bone tumours and cysts, myeloma / plasmacytoma, infection and primary and secondary malignant bone tumours

Categorising bone mineral density

Categorising bone mineral density

Based on bone densitometry, measured by DEXA and the T score, the World Health Organization classifies the patients into three categories:

  • Normal bone density: T score greater than -1.
  • Osteopaenia (low bone mass): T score between -1 and -2.5.
  • Osteoporosis: T score less than -2.5

Risk factors

Risk factors

The risk factors highlighted in blue currently attract a medicare rebate in Australia

FRAX and Garvan risk calculators

FRAX and Garvan risk calculators

The FRAX and Garvan risk calculators have been developed to evaluate fracture risk in patients and are dependant on a variety of factors. Caution should be exercised when solely using risk calculators to make decisions in regards to initiation and more importantly withholding of treatment. The decision to treat should be made on a variety of clinical factors. Risk calculators can be of assistance to stratify / re-stratify patients into risk categories which can aid in determining frequency of clinical monitoring

The FRAX calculator uses the following parameters, as well as geographical region of the patient, to assess for fracture risk:

  • Age
  • Sex
  • Weight
  • Height
  • Previous fracture
  • Parent who has had a fracture hip
  • Current smoking status
  • Use of glucocorticoids
  • Presence of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Secondary causes of osteoporosis
  • Alcohol consumption
  • Femoral neck BMD (if available)

The Garvan calculator uses the following parameters to assess for fracture risk:

  • Age
  • Sex
  • Number of fractures since the age of 50 (excluding major trauma)
  • Falls in the past 12 months
  • BMD measurement (if available)
  • Weight

Go to FRAX 

Go to Garvan 

  • Acute Abdomen
  • Breast
  • Cancer Staging
  • Cardiovascular
  • Ear, Nose & Throat
  • Endocrine
  • Gastrointestinal
  • Kidney and Urinary Tract
  • Liver and Biliary
  • Musculoskeletal Non-Trauma
  • Neurological
  • Obstetric & Gynaecological
  • Paediatric
  • Pancreas
  • Respiratory
  • Trauma
    • Trauma - Musculoskeletal
    • Trauma - Head
    • Trauma - Visceral
    • Trauma - Paediatric
  • Endocrine

    • Endocrine
      • Adrenal Lesion (Incidental)
      • Adrenal Mass (Incidental on CT)
      • Cushing's syndrome
      • Goitre (investigation)
      • Hyperaldosteronism (primary suspected)
      • Hyperparathyroidism (primary suspected)
      • Hyperthyroidism
      • Osteoporosis (suspected)
      • Phaeochromocytoma (suspected)
      • Thyroid nodule (incidental)

    Diagnostic Imaging Pathways

    The DIP pathways are a step-by-step guides to help clinicians choose the most appropriate imaging for each clinical scenario 

    “Trusted by clinicians worldwide since 2007, Diagnostic Imaging Pathways provides clear, evidence-based imaging guidelines. Our pathways support better decision-making and help improve healthcare outcomes—especially in emerging nations. 

    DIP functions and thrives wholeheartedly under the pillars of diversity, inclusivity and respect for all."

    • Pathways
    • Normal Anatomy
    • Medical Images
    • Radiation Module
    • Radiation Quiz
    • Information for Consumers
    • Governance
    • About Imaging
    • Production
    • Search
    • Login
    • Get in Touch
    © Diagnostic Imaging Pathways (DIP) 2025
    Code of Conduct    Terms and Conditions of Use
    General Site Navigation

    Information For Consumers

    • General Information About Diagnostic Imaging
      • Colorectal (Bowel) Cancer Screening
      • Colorectal (Bowel) Cancer Screening (Australia)
      • Consent to Procedure or Treatment
      • Radiation Risks of X-rays and Scans
    • Imaging Pathways
      • Ankle Injury (Suspected)
      • Bowel Cancer (Staging)
      • Deep Venous Thrombosis ( Leg, Suspected)
      • Deep Venous Thrombosis (Arm, Suspected)
      • Headache (Constant or Repeated)
      • Hip Fracture (Suspected)
      • Hypertension
      • Low Back Pain (Acute)
      • Lung Cancer (Staging)
      • Neck Pain (Non-Traumatic)
      • Renal Colic
      • Respiratory Illness (Acute)
      • Scaphoid Fracture (Suspected)
      • Shoulder (Pain or Instability)
      • Sinusitis (Acute)
      • Sinusitis (Chronic)
      • Stress Fracture (Suspected)
    • Imaging Procedures
      • Angiography (Angiogram)
      • Arthrogram
      • Bone Scan
      • Computed Tomography (CT)
      • Computed Tomography (CT) Angiography
      • Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters
      • Intravenous Pyelogram (IVP)
      • Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)
      • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
      • Myelogram
      • Orthopantomogram (OPG)
      • Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) or Biopsy
      • Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
      • Renal Artery Angioplasty and Stent
      • Renal Scan
      • Ultrasound
      • Ultrasound (Doppler)
      • Ultrasound (Endoscopic Rectal)
      • Venography (Venogram)
      • X-ray (Chest)
      • X-ray (Plain Radiograph)

    Governance

    • History
      • 1990s to 2012
      • 2012 to 2016
      • 2016 to 11 April 2022
      • From 12 April 2022
      • Introduction
      • List of acronyms used on this site
    • Organisation
      • 2003 - 2012
      • 2013 - 2016
      • 2017 - 11 April 2022
      • Post 12 April 2022
    • Personnel
      • Clinical Advisors
      • Contractors
      • Contributors
      • Editor
      • Editorial Panel - Post 2022
      • Editorial Panel - Pre 2022
      • Executive Sponsor
      • Information Technologist
      • Manager
      • Other Personnel
      • Project Officers
      • Quality Coordinator
      • Research Registrar
      • Responsibilites
      • Steering Committee
      • Steering Committee
    • Responsibilities, Achievements
      • Accreditation and Endorsement
      • Clinical Advisors
      • Editor
      • Editorial Panel
      • Executive Sponsor
      • Information Technologist
      • Manager
      • Other Personnel
      • Pathway Creation, Review and Revision
      • Quality Coordinator
      • Research Registrar
      • Steering Committee

    About Imaging

    • About Imaging
      • Bleeding Risk and Assessment
      • General Principles in Requesting and Providing Imaging Investigations
      • Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation
      • Ionising Radiation in Diagnostic Imaging
      • Ionising Radiation in Paediatric Imaging
    • Common Procedures
      • Computed Tomography
      • Gastrointestinal Contrast Examinations
      • High Resolution Computed Tomography
      • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
      • Nuclear Medicine
      • Positron Emission Tomography
      • Ultrasound
    • Contrast Agents
      • Gadolinium Contrast for MRI scans
      • Iodinated Contrast for CT scans
      • Ultrasound Contrast Media

    Production

    • Editorial Independence
      • Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
      • Funding Policy & Sources
      • Management of Conflict of Interest
    • Processes for Creating and Managing Content
      • Creation of a New Pathway
      • Creation of New Information for Consumers
      • Review and Revision of a Pathway
      • Review and Revision of Information for Consumers
    • Production
      • Initial Engagement with Consumers
      • Principles for Creating and Managing Content