Diagnostic Imaging Pathways Logo

  • Pathways
  • Normal Anatomy
  • Medical Images
  • Radiation Module
  • Radiation Quiz
  • Menu
  • Search

Respiratory illness (acute)

Population Covered By The Guidance

This pathway provides guidance on imaging patients with acute respiratory illness and provides guidelines as to who would benefit from plain chest radiography.

Lead Researcher: Gurjeet Dulku

Experts & Contributors: Buirski, Emmeline Lee, William MacDonald, Richard Mendelson, Brett Montgomerry, Peter Scally, Yuranga Weerakkody

Editorial Panel: Core Membership

Date reviewed: June 2015

Date Published: February 2016

Images 1a and 1b (Plain Radiograph, PA and Lateral): There is widespread consolidation of the right lung with air bronchograms and bulging of the fissues (arrows) indicative of lobar pneumonia.

Pneumococcal Pneumonia

Images 1a and 1b (Plain Radiograph, PA and Lateral): There is widespread consolidation of the right lung with air bronchograms and bulging of the fissues (arrows) indicative of lobar pneumonia.

Pneumococcal Pneumonia

Image 2 (Plain Radiograph): Patchy bilateral infiltrates extending from the perihilar region is suggestive of Pneumocystis jirovecii (formely Pneumocystic carinii) infection in this immunocompromised patient.

Pneumocystis Pneumonia

Image 3 (Plain Radiograph): There is right middle and upper lobe consolidation with bilateral paratracheal lymphadenopathy (arrows). Multiple small nodules are scattered throughout the remaining lung parenchyma (arrowheads) indicative of tuberculous pneumonia with miliary spread.

Tuberculous Pneumonia

Images 4a and 4b (Plain Radiograph, PA and Lateral): A large circumscibed lesion is present in the right lower lobe with a well defined wall and an air-fluid level consistent with a lung abscess.

Lung Abscess

Images 4a and 4b (Plain Radiograph, PA and Lateral): A large circumscibed lesion is present in the right lower lobe with a well defined wall and an air-fluid level consistent with a lung abscess.

Lung Abscess

Images 5a and 5b : Post-mortem specimen showing patchy areas of consolidation consistent with bronchopneumonia.

Bronchopneumonia

Images 5a and 5b : Post-mortem specimen showing patchy areas of consolidation consistent with bronchopneumonia.

Bronchopneumonia

Images 6a, 6b and 6c (Plain Radiograph): There is collapse of the right upper lobe, the left upper lobe( the Golden S sign) and the left lower lobe respectively.

Collapse Lung

Images 6a, 6b and 6c (Plain Radiograph): There is collapse of the right upper lobe, the left upper lobe( the Golden S sign) and the left lower lobe respectively.

Collapse Lung

Collapse Lung

Role of Imaging in Acute Respiratory Illness

  • Chest radiography is over utilized in the management of acute respiratory illness
  • Certain clinical symptoms and signs can suggest a diagnosis of pneumonia but none can definitely rule in or out the diagnosis
  • 5% of patients with acute respiratory illness have pneumonia from a primary care setting. This increases to 28% of patients in the accident and emergency environment
  • CT is not routine in the setting of acute respiratory illness
  • Lung ultrasonography (LUS) has shown to be promising in the evaluation of pneumothorax, pleural effusion and consolidations but with varying outcomes for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Therefore, an inconspicuous LUS does not exclude pneumonia and necessitates a chest radiography or chest CT scan for further evaluation

Date of literature search: June 2015

The search methodology is available on request. Email

References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document

  1. Heckerling PS, Tape TG, Wigton RS, et al. Clinical prediction rule for pulmonary infiltrates. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:664-70. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  2. Rothrock SG, Green SM, Costanzo KA, et al. High yield criteria for obtaining non-trauma chest radiography in the adult emergency department population. J Emerg Med. 2002;23:117-24. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  3. Cereser L, Zuiani C, Graziani G, Girometti R, Como G, Zaja F, et al. Impact of clinical data on chest radiography sensitivity in detecting pulmonary abnormalities in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. Radiol Med. 2010;115(2):205-14. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  4. Wilkins TR, Wilkins RL. Clinical and radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Radiol Technol. 2005;77(2):106-10. (Review article). View the reference
  5. Heckerling PS. The need for chest roentgenograms in adults with acute respiratory illness: clinical predictors. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:1321-4. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
  6. Butcher BL, Nichol KL, Parenti CM. High yield of chest radiography in walk-in clinic patients with chest symptoms. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:115-9. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  7. Benacerraf BR, McLoud TC, Rhea JT, et al. An assessment of the contribution of chest radiography in outpatients with acute complaints: a prospective study. Radiology. 1981;138:293-9. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
  8. Okimoto N, Yamato K, Kurihara T, Honda Y, Osaki K, Asaoka N, et al. Clinical predictors for the detection of community-acquired pneumonia in adults as a guide to ordering chest radiographs. Respirology. 2006;11(3):322-4. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  9. O'Brien WT, Sr., Rohweder DA, Lattin GE, Jr., Thornton JA, Dutton JP, Ebert-Long DL, et al. Clinical indicators of radiographic findings in patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia: who needs a chest x-ray? J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(9):703-6. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  10. van Vugt SF, Verheij TJ, de Jong PA, Butler CC, Hood K, Coenen S, et al. Diagnosing pneumonia in patients with acute cough: clinical judgment compared to chest radiography. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(4):1076-82. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  11. Basi SK, Marrie TJ, Huang JQ, Majumdar SR. Patients admitted to hospital with suspected pneumonia and normal chest radiographs: epidemiology, microbiology, and outcomes. Am J Med. 2004;117(5):305-11. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  12. Cao AM, Choy JP, Mohanakrishnan LN, Bain RF, van Driel ML. Chest radiographs for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD009119. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  13. Simpson JCG, Hulse P, Taylor PM, Woodhead M. Do radiographic features of acute infection influence management of lower respiratory tract infections in the community? Eur Respir J. 1998;12:1384-7. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
  14. Metlay JP, Kapoor WN, Fine MJ. Does this patient have community-acquired pneumonia? Diagnosing pneumonia by history and physical examination. JAMA. 1997;278:1440-5. (Review article). View the reference
  15. Speets AM, Hoes AW, van der Graaf Y, Kalmijn S, Sachs AP, Mali WP. Chest radiography and pneumonia in primary care: diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(5):933-8. (Level II/III evidence). View the reference
  16. Graffelman AW, Willemssen FE, Zonderland HM, Neven AK, Kroes AC, van den Broek PJ. Limited value of chest radiography in predicting aetiology of lower respiratory tract infection in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(547):93-7. (Level II/III evidence). View the reference
  17. Hagaman JT, Rouan GW, Shipley RT, Panos RJ. Admission chest radiograph lacks sensitivity in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med Sci. 2009;337(4):236-40. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  18. Bruns AH, Oosterheert JJ, Prokop M, Lammers JW, Hak E, Hoepelman AI. Patterns of resolution of chest radiograph abnormalities in adults hospitalized with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(8):983-91. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  19. Aronson S, Gennis P, Kelly D, et al. The value of routine admission chest radiographs in adult asthmatics. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:1206-8. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
  20. Findley LJ, Sahn SA. The value of chest roentgenograms in acute asthma in adults. Chest. 1981;80:535-6. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
  21. Brixey AG, Luo Y, Skouras V, Awdankiewicz A, Light RW. The efficacy of chest radiographs in detecting parapneumonic effusions. Respirology. 2011;16(6):1000-4. (Level III evidence). View the reference
  22. Corradi F, Brusasco C, Garlaschi A, Paparo F, Ball L, Santori G, et al. Quantitative analysis of lung ultrasonography for the detection of community-acquired pneumonia: a pilot study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:868707. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  23. Reissig A, Copetti R. Lung ultrasound in community-acquired pneumonia and in interstitial lung diseases. Respiration. 2014;87(3):179-89. (Review article). View the reference
  24. Turner JP, Dankoff J. Thoracic ultrasound. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2012;30(2):451-73, ix. (Review article). View the reference
  25. Lichtenstein DA, Meziere GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25. View the reference
  26. Volpicelli G, Caramello V, Cardinale L, Cravino M. Diagnosis of radio-occult pulmonary conditions by real-time chest ultrasonography in patients with pleuritic pain. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(11):1717-23. (Level II/III evidence). View the reference
  27. Reissig A, Copetti R, Mathis G, Mempel C, Schuler A, Zechner P, et al. Lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective, multicenter, diagnostic accuracy study. Chest. 2012;142(4):965-72. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  28. Chavez MA, Shams N, Ellington LE, Naithani N, Gilman RH, Steinhoff MC, et al. Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2014;15:50. (Level I evidence). View the reference
  29. Zanobetti M, Poggioni C, Pini R. Can chest ultrasonography replace standard chest radiography for evaluation of acute dyspnea in the ed? Chest. 2011;139(5):1140-7. (Level II evidence). View the reference
  30. Laursen CB, Sloth E, Lambrechtsen J, Lassen AT, Madsen PH, Henriksen DP, et al. Focused sonography of the heart, lungs, and deep veins identifies missed life-threatening conditions in admitted patients with acute respiratory symptoms. Chest. 2013;144(6):1868-75. (Level II evidence). View the reference

Pathway User Guide

Yellow Boxes Denotes extra information. Some contain single or multiple white sub-boxes, click a white box to reveal detailed information in a pop-up.

White Boxes: Denotes standard pathway steps. (If inside a yellow box, they open a specific pop-up).

Zoom & Pan Controls: Use + / − or the slider to zoom. Reset returns to default. Tick Panning to drag the diagram when zoomed.

Blue “View Full Screen” Button: Opens the whole diagram in a large, full-screen pop-up window. Use Close to exit.

The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.

SYMBOL RRL EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE
No radiation None 0
Minimal radiation Minimal < 1 millisieverts
Low radiation Low 1-5 mSv
Medium radiation Medium 5-10 mSv
High radiation High >10 mSv

Disclaimer

Status Of Recommendations Each pathway is designed to assist clinicians in situations when faced with a large array of possible diagnostic tests and examinations. However, it is recognised that diagnostic practice may differ from a particular pathway depending on local availability of equipment and expertise, as well as the experience of individual clinicians. Therefore each pathway is neither a rigid set of rules, nor a substitute for clinical assessment, and individual patient circumstances should always be considered.

Report an Issue

Spotted an error or outdated info? Click to tell us.

Date reviewed: June 2015Please note that this pathway issubject to review and revisionEmergency/Intensive Care Unit (ICU)settingIs lung ultrasonography and expertisereadily available?YesPositive findingsHigh riskLow riskAppropriatemanagementNegative findingsand/orsuspected complicationsComplications or notresolving despitetreatmentChest radiograph lesslikely to show anabnormalityNoPrimary care setting What do I need to know?1. Are there repeated presentations despite treatment for infection or is there clinically suspicious disease progression?2. Is the patient high risk or immunocompromised?3. Does the patient have significant clinical findings?4. Is lung ultrasound readily available?RESPIRATORY ILLNESS(ACUTE)Whether the patient should have a chestradiograph (CXR) will be based onindividual clinical factors. Important factorsfound in two studies to increase thelikelihood of a significant abnormality onCXR are shown belowChest radiograph andLung ultrasonography(LUS)Chest radiographChest Computed Tomography(CT)(for further evaluation) Study 1• Temp >37.8°C• Pulse >100/min• Crackles• Decreased breath sounds• Absence of asthma Study 2• Age >60• Temp >38.0°C• Oxygen saturation <90%• RR >24 breaths/min• Haemoptysis• Crackles• Decreased breath sounds• History of alcohol abuse• History of tuberculosis• History of thromboembolic disease

Factors That Increase The Likelihood Of A Significant Abnormality On Chest Radiograph

Factors That Increase The Likelihood Of A Significant Abnormality On Chest Radiograp

Certain symptoms and signs can suggest a diagnosis of pneumonia but none can definitely rule in or rule out the diagnosis. The factors listed below come from two studies, which developed clinical decision rules for predicting chest radiograph abnormalities

  • The factors listed below come from two studies that attempted to develop clinical decision rules for predicting chest radiograph abnormalities
  • Study 1
    • Temp >37.8°C
    • Pulse >100/min
    • Crackles
    • Decreased breath sounds
    • Absence of asthma
  • Study 2
    • Age >60
    • Temp >38°C
    • Oxygen saturation < 90%
    • Respiratory rate >24 breaths/min
    • Haemoptysis
    • Crackles
    • Decreased breath sounds
    • History of alcohol abuse
    • History of tuberculosis
    • History of thromboembolic disease
  • Patients who are immunocompromised should be investigated initially with a chest radiograph if there is clinical suspicion of an acute respiratory illness. However the sensitivity of chest radiograph is too low to consider it a stand-alone technique for the evaluation of immunocompromised patients whose immune reactivity is poorer and delayed compared with immuno-competent ones, with suspected pneumonia. For these patients, an early chest CT evaluation is therefore recommended
  • Fever and tachypnoea in children are strong indicators that a chest radiograph is needed. No single sign or symptom predicts pneumonia with a high degree of certainty in adult and geriatrics patients. Clinical utility of chest radiograph can be improved with careful clinical examination of patients before obtaining radiographs, especially in paediatric patients
  • A number of other studies have attempted to identify which patients should have a chest radiograph but none concur on significant factors
  • The absence of radiographic findings should not supersede clinical judgment and empiric treatments in patients with clinical suspicion of pneumonia

See Reference 1

See Reference 1

 Heckerling PS, Tape TG, Wigton RS, et al. Clinical prediction rule for pulmonary infiltrates. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:664-70

See Reference 2

See Reference 2

Rothrock SG, Green SM, Costanzo KA, et al. High yield criteria for obtaining non-trauma chest radiography in the adult emergency department population. J Emerg Med. 2002;23:117-24

Chest Radiography

Chest Radiography

The first line investigation where necessary for patients with acute respiratory illness

  • Patients with acute respiratory illness but without pneumonia often have unnecessary chest radiographs and these result in unnecessary cost and radiation exposure
  • Many patients with acute respiratory illness receive a chest radiograph, usually to diagnose or exclude pneumonia
  • Approximately 5% of patients who present to their primary care physician with an acute respiratory illness will have pneumonia as chest radiography was not very useful for diagnosing pneumonia in patients with a low clinical probability of pneumonia
  • Of patients with an acute respiratory illness who present to an Emergency Department, as many as 28% will have pneumonia
  • Admission radiographs lacks sensitivity and may not demonstrate parenchymal opacifications in 21% of patients. Moreover, greater than half of patients admitted with a negative chest radiograph will develop radiographic infiltrates within 48 hours. , Because of the low sensitivity and inter-observer variability, some of the infiltrates can be missed
  • Routine short-term follow-up chest radiographs (18
  • Patients with acute asthma occasionally have significant abnormalities on chest radiography and may only require imaging if there is suspected pneumonia or pneumothorax ,
  • More than 10% of para-pneumonic effusions are missed on chest radiographs (lateral, PA and AP) with the majority presenting effusions missed in each view were on films with lower lobe consolidation in which clinicians should consider obtaining a lung ultrasound

Chest Computed Tomography (CT)

Chest Computed Tomography (CT)

Indications for chest CT include

  • Infiltrate, opacity, collapse or consolidation on plain chest radiograph that does not resolve after treatment for infection, or fit with the clinical picture
  • Non-resolving infection or recurring infections in the same locations
  • Suspected emphysema
  • Suspected bronchiectasis
  • Immunocompromised patients with fever of unknown origin and a potential chest source even if plain chest radiography is normal

CT is not routine in the setting of an acute respiratory illness. Indications for CT include

  • Infiltrate, opacity, collapse, or consolidation on plain chest radiograph that does not resolve after treatment for infection, or fit with the clinical picture
  • Non-resolving infection, or recurring infections in the same location
  • Suspected empyema
  • Suspected bronchiectasis
  • Immunocompromised patients with fever of unknown origin and a potential chest source even if plain chest radiography is normal

Lung Ultrasonography (LUS)

Lung Ultrasonography (LUS)

In the emergency and critical care setting, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has shown to be promising in the evaluation of pneumothorax, pleural effusion and consolidations but with varying outcomes for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Therefore, an inconspicuous LUS does not exclude pneumonia and necessitates a chest radiography or chest CT scan for further evaluation

  • In comparison with chest radiography, especially in the emergency and critical care setting, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has shown to be promising with excellent sensitivity 93-94%, specificity 95-96% and diagnostic accuracy 94% in the evaluation of pneumothorax, pleural effusion and consolidations ,
  • LUS have varying outcomes for the diagnosis of pneumonia ,
  • Despite this, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis revealed encouraging results to support the use of lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pneumonia
  • About 8% of pneumonic lesions are not detectable by LUS; therefore, an inconspicuous LUS does not exclude pneumonia. Chest radiography or chest CT scan is necessary in cases with negative ultrasound results or if other differential diagnoses are considered or if complications occur
  • Advantages of LUS ,
    • No ionising radiation; hence is preferred in pregnant or presumed pregnant patients and children
    • Can be utilized as point-of-care imaging in severely ill, frail and bedridden patients at the bedside
    • The evaluation is easy and fast to perform
  • Due to its high negative predictive value (NPV), LUS's value as a standard rule-out (SnNout) examination in patients with respiratory symptoms should be considered ,

  • Acute Abdomen
  • Breast
  • Cancer Staging
  • Cardiovascular
  • Ear, Nose & Throat
  • Endocrine
  • Gastrointestinal
  • Kidney and Urinary Tract
  • Liver and Biliary
  • Musculoskeletal Non-Trauma
  • Neurological
  • Obstetric & Gynaecological
  • Paediatric
  • Pancreas
  • Respiratory
  • Trauma
    • Trauma - Musculoskeletal
    • Trauma - Head
    • Trauma - Visceral
    • Trauma - Paediatric
  • Respiratory

    • Respiratory
      • Bronchiectasis
      • Chest X-Ray (Pre-Operative Indications)
      • Dyspnoea (chronic)
      • Haemoptysis
      • Mediastinal mass (suspected)
      • Non-small cell lung cancer (staging)
      • Pulmonary embolism (Haemodynamically Stable)
      • Pulmonary embolism (haemodynamically unstable)
      • Pulmonary Embolism (Pregnancy, Suspected)
      • Pulmonary Nodules (Solid)
      • Pulmonary Nodules (Subsolid)
      • Raised Hemidiaphragm On Chest X-ray
      • Respiratory illness (acute)
      • Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (Chronic, Suspected)

    Diagnostic Imaging Pathways

    The DIP pathways are a step-by-step guides to help clinicians choose the most appropriate imaging for each clinical scenario 

    “Trusted by clinicians worldwide since 2007, Diagnostic Imaging Pathways provides clear, evidence-based imaging guidelines. Our pathways support better decision-making and help improve healthcare outcomes—especially in emerging nations. 

    DIP functions and thrives wholeheartedly under the pillars of diversity, inclusivity and respect for all."

    • Pathways
    • Normal Anatomy
    • Medical Images
    • Radiation Module
    • Radiation Quiz
    • Information for Consumers
    • Governance
    • About Imaging
    • Production
    • Search
    • Login
    • Get in Touch
    © Diagnostic Imaging Pathways (DIP) 2025
    Code of Conduct    Terms and Conditions of Use
    General Site Navigation

    Information For Consumers

    • General Information About Diagnostic Imaging
      • Colorectal (Bowel) Cancer Screening
      • Colorectal (Bowel) Cancer Screening (Australia)
      • Consent to Procedure or Treatment
      • Radiation Risks of X-rays and Scans
    • Imaging Pathways
      • Ankle Injury (Suspected)
      • Bowel Cancer (Staging)
      • Deep Venous Thrombosis ( Leg, Suspected)
      • Deep Venous Thrombosis (Arm, Suspected)
      • Headache (Constant or Repeated)
      • Hip Fracture (Suspected)
      • Hypertension
      • Low Back Pain (Acute)
      • Lung Cancer (Staging)
      • Neck Pain (Non-Traumatic)
      • Renal Colic
      • Respiratory Illness (Acute)
      • Scaphoid Fracture (Suspected)
      • Shoulder (Pain or Instability)
      • Sinusitis (Acute)
      • Sinusitis (Chronic)
      • Stress Fracture (Suspected)
    • Imaging Procedures
      • Angiography (Angiogram)
      • Arthrogram
      • Bone Scan
      • Computed Tomography (CT)
      • Computed Tomography (CT) Angiography
      • Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters
      • Intravenous Pyelogram (IVP)
      • Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)
      • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
      • Myelogram
      • Orthopantomogram (OPG)
      • Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) or Biopsy
      • Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
      • Renal Artery Angioplasty and Stent
      • Renal Scan
      • Ultrasound
      • Ultrasound (Doppler)
      • Ultrasound (Endoscopic Rectal)
      • Venography (Venogram)
      • X-ray (Chest)
      • X-ray (Plain Radiograph)

    Governance

    • History
      • 1990s to 2012
      • 2012 to 2016
      • 2016 to 11 April 2022
      • From 12 April 2022
      • Introduction
      • List of acronyms used on this site
    • Organisation
      • 2003 - 2012
      • 2013 - 2016
      • 2017 - 11 April 2022
      • Post 12 April 2022
    • Personnel
      • Clinical Advisors
      • Contractors
      • Contributors
      • Editor
      • Editorial Panel - Post 2022
      • Editorial Panel - Pre 2022
      • Executive Sponsor
      • Information Technologist
      • Manager
      • Other Personnel
      • Project Officers
      • Quality Coordinator
      • Research Registrar
      • Responsibilites
      • Steering Committee
      • Steering Committee
    • Responsibilities, Achievements
      • Accreditation and Endorsement
      • Clinical Advisors
      • Editor
      • Editorial Panel
      • Executive Sponsor
      • Information Technologist
      • Manager
      • Other Personnel
      • Pathway Creation, Review and Revision
      • Quality Coordinator
      • Research Registrar
      • Steering Committee

    About Imaging

    • About Imaging
      • Bleeding Risk and Assessment
      • General Principles in Requesting and Providing Imaging Investigations
      • Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation
      • Ionising Radiation in Diagnostic Imaging
      • Ionising Radiation in Paediatric Imaging
    • Common Procedures
      • Computed Tomography
      • Gastrointestinal Contrast Examinations
      • High Resolution Computed Tomography
      • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
      • Nuclear Medicine
      • Positron Emission Tomography
      • Ultrasound
    • Contrast Agents
      • Gadolinium Contrast for MRI scans
      • Iodinated Contrast for CT scans
      • Ultrasound Contrast Media

    Production

    • Editorial Independence
      • Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
      • Funding Policy & Sources
      • Management of Conflict of Interest
    • Processes for Creating and Managing Content
      • Creation of a New Pathway
      • Creation of New Information for Consumers
      • Review and Revision of a Pathway
      • Review and Revision of Information for Consumers
    • Production
      • Initial Engagement with Consumers
      • Principles for Creating and Managing Content